Huge Disadvantage When Marketing Properties as ‘Do Not Display Address’

Posted in real estate, rmls on June 1st, 2010 by Matt

Why not display an address when marketing a property? The two big reasons I’ve heard are:

1) Use it as a marketing tactic to generate more calls

2) To protect privacy, or fear of theft.

Now, there is data to support that you will get more contacts if you show the address.

Zillow analysts found that properties on Zillow that display an address receive 6 TIMES more page views than properties that hid the address. Further, properties with the address displayed also received 6 TIMES the inquiries.

Why is this? 3 main reasons:

1)    Map search – Today, almost every real estate site has some kind of map search, as well as a list search. On Zillow, if we are told not to display the address (NDA), then the home’s location on the map will appear in a general area for that home’s ZIP code – it will not appear in the exact location. We all know one street can vary widely from the next street and having the location – especially if it’s a desirable location – will help the seller.

2) Mobile real estate search – Many mobile applications have GPS-enabled search to answer the question “what’s for sale in the area I am in right now” (such as the Zillow iPhone App or Zillow Android App). Without being able to map properties exactly, NDA properties are missing out on the huge opportunity of mobile exposure. This one will continue to grow in importance.

3) Search engines – We all know that search engines are important website visitors that can’t be ignored. There are huge opportunities for specific addresses to be found in search results, and the likelihood grows as people become more specific in their searches – even searching for actual addresses. Again, if the address isn’t displayed, Google can’t see it, and can’t serve it.

All three of these significantly contribute to the amount of traffic a listing will receive if the address is displayed versus if it is not. The exposure loss can be huge. And with less page views, there are less inquiries, as the data shows.

In pulling the numbers, one thing that did surprise me was that the percentage of times someone did send an inquiry was actually the same whether an address was displayed or not. So this finding contradicts the idea that hiding the address generates more responses. My guess is that the people who do reach out to find out where the property is located must counteract those who are annoyed by the lack of data or discount the property altogether because the location is hidden.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Handy Guide to Detecting Support for HTML5

Posted in General, Helpful Information on June 1st, 2010 by Matt
What language does that browser speak?What language does that browser speak?

Web developers wanting to use the new features in HTML5 or CSS3 are still struggling with incomplete and inconsistent browser support. While HTML5 isn’t perfect (or complete), that doesn’t mean you can’t start using it; it just means using it is a little more complicated since you need to detect the current browser’s level of support and then adjust accordingly.

One solution is to use some JavaScript to detect the level of support in the current browser and then use HTML5 where you can and offer alternatives to browser that don’t support the features you’re using.

Modernizr is handy little library can detect which HTML5 features are available to the current user’s browser. Armed with that information you can then create conditional JavaScript statements to offer HTML5 to those browsers that support it, but still fall back on other content for those that don’t.

There are however, some cases where Modernizr might be overkill. For example, if you just want to embed some HTML5 video, you only need to detect one element. If Modernizr isn’t right for your project, check out Mark Pilgrim’s new list of ways of detecting HTML5 elements. The list of elements and how to detect them is an appendix to Pilgrim’s book in progress, Dive Into HTML5.

The list isn’t just elements, though it does cover those as well, but it also shows you how to detect API support for things like offline storage or geolocation, as well as SVG, SVG-in-HTML and even which video codec the current browser supports.

One thing Pilgrim doesn’t include is detecting CSS3 features, so if you need to that info you’re on your own (or you can use Modernizr, which detects most of CSS3).

See Also:

Photo: Darwin Bell via Flickr/CC

Tags: , , ,